Avalanche decision-making frameworks: Factors and methods used by experts

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Abstract argumentation frameworks to promote fairness and rationality in multi-experts multi-criteria decision making

In this work, we focus on multi-criteria decision making and in particular, in the case of multiple experts (ME-MCDM). The problem of making decisions when multiple (possibly conflicting) criteria are involved often boils down to identifying an aggregation function that will combine all appreciations of the multiple dimensions of the problem. In the case of Multiple Experts, decisions even alre...

متن کامل

Factors identified by experts to support decision making for post acute referral.

BACKGROUND Each year, more than 13 million post acute referral decisions are made for Medicare recipients, yet there are no national, empirically derived decision support tools to assist in making these important decisions. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to elicit expert knowledge about factors important to referral decision making and identify the characteristics of hospitalized patien...

متن کامل

Experts and Decision Making: First Steps Towards a Unifying Theory of Decision Making in Novices, Intermediates and Experts

Expertise research shows quite ambiguous results on the abilities of experts in judgment and decision making (JDM) classic models cannot account for. This problem becomes even more accentuated if different levels of expertise are considered. We argue that parallel constraint satisfaction models (PCS) might be a useful base to understand the processes underlying expert JDM and the hitherto exist...

متن کامل

Comparison of Decision-Making Methods Comparison of Decision-Making Methods

A comparison is made between the most commonly used decision-making method (AHP), and two methods developed by the authors (APM and CSM). It is shown that the newly developed methods do not change the correlations and types of inequalities between the global priorities of the alternatives when the number of alternatives changes. This differentiates them from the AHP, which does change them. Als...

متن کامل

Moral Decision Making Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence

The generality of decision and game theory has enabled domain-independent progress in AI research. For example, a better algorithm for finding good policies in (PO)MDPs can be instantly used in a variety of applications. But such a general theory is lacking when it comes to moral decision making. For AI applications with a moral component, are we then forced to build systems based on many ad-ho...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Cold Regions Science and Technology

سال: 2020

ISSN: 0165-232X

DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102897